Gould v. Winokur
252 A.2d 157, 53 N.J. 582
This text of 252 A.2d 157 (Gould v. Winokur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gould v. Winokur, 252 A.2d 157, 53 N.J. 582 (N.J. 1969).
Opinion
ELMER GOULD, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
GERALD WINOKUR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Balk, Jacobs, Goldberger & Mandell for the petitioner.
Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne and Mr. H. Curtis Meanor for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. Racquet Club of Bricktown
471 A.2d 25 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Klimko v. Rose
422 A.2d 418 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
Nopco Chemical Co. v. Blaw-Knox Co.
272 A.2d 549 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
252 A.2d 157, 53 N.J. 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-winokur-nj-1969.