Gould v. Winokur
252 A.2d 157, 53 N.J. 582
Opinion
ELMER GOULD, PLAINTIFF-PETITIONER,
v.
GERALD WINOKUR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Balk, Jacobs, Goldberger & Mandell for the petitioner.
Messrs. Lamb, Blake, Hutchinson & Dunne and Mr. H. Curtis Meanor for the respondent.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gould v. Winokur, 252 A.2d 157, 53 N.J. 582 (N.J. 1969).
252 A.2d 157 (Gould v. Winokur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Racquet Club of Bricktown
471 A.2d 25 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Klimko v. Rose
422 A.2d 418 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
Nopco Chemical Co. v. Blaw-Knox Co.
272 A.2d 549 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)