Gould v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Gould v. State

146 S.W. 179

DecidedMarch 27, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.W. 179 (Gould v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gould v. State, 146 S.W. 179 (Tex. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted under complaint and information charging him with violating the Sunday law, in that he opened and permitted to be open a place of public amusement on Sunday, and with then and there permitting a theatrical performance to be given, to which an admission fee was charged. This is a companion case to that-of C. F. Gould v. State, No. 1,558, 146 S. W. 172, this day decided, and the same issues are raised as are therein decided; the only difference being that this offense is alleged to have been committed on Sunday, January 15, 1911, and the former conviction relied on to increase the penalty is alleged to have occurred on the 12th day of September, 1910. The same motion was filed to quash the information, and the same exceptions _ were reserved. In fact, the issues are identical, and we do not deem it necessary to again_ discuss them, and for the reasons stated in said cause No. 1,558 the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

Appellant was prosecuted under complaint and information charging him with violating the Sunday law, in that he opened and permitted to be open a place of public amusement on Sunday, and with then and there permitting a theatrical performance to be given, to which an admission fee was charged. This is a companion case to that-of C. F. Gould v. State, No. 1,558, 146 S. W. 172, this day decided, and the same issues are raised as are therein decided; the only difference being that this offense is alleged to have been committed on Sunday, January 15, 1911, and the former conviction relied on to increase the penalty is alleged to have occurred on the 12th day of September, 1910. The same motion was filed to quash the information, and the same exceptions _ were reserved. In fact, the issues are identical, and we do not deem it necessary to again_ discuss them, and for the reasons stated in said cause No. 1,558 the judgment in this case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.W. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack