Gould v. Newport News Circuit Court

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 2009
Docket08-8437
StatusUnpublished

This text of Gould v. Newport News Circuit Court (Gould v. Newport News Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gould v. Newport News Circuit Court, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8437

KELVIN GOULD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NEWPORT NEWS CIRCUIT COURT; OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR THE CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA; ALEXANDER LEVY; BRIAN KEELEY; OLDRIC J. LABELL, JR.; ROBERT N. PRITCHARD; ALEXANDRIA CHUN; AARON M. THORNTON, Detective, Newport News Police Department; AUNDRIA D. FOSTER, Circuit Court Judge; ARTISHA K. TODD, Assistant District Attorney; REYNOLD W. JORDAN, JR., Social Worker; LINDA FAIRCLOTH, Social Worker; EDWARD W. WEBB, Public Defender; PETER S. ECONOMOU, Chief Deputy Public Defender; DAVID B. OLSON, VSB No. 03662, Law Offices; JEFFREY C. ROUNTREE, Attorney at Law,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:08-cv-00465-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kelvin Gould, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Gould v. Newport News Circuit Ct., No.

2:08-cv-00465-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 5, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gould v. Newport News Circuit Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-newport-news-circuit-court-ca4-2009.