Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.
This text of 71 P. 1124 (Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action brought by the appellee corporation against Martin Gould and three other defendants owning lands lying under the Maricopa Canal in Maricopa County to enjoin and restrain said defendants from entering upon said canal, interfering with the headgates therein, or in any manner obstructing the appellee in the operation and management of its said canal and headgates. The case involves the same questions as that of Hayois v. Salt River Canal Co., (decided at the present term), ante, p. 285, 71 Pac. 944. Por the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment here appealed from is also affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 P. 1124, 8 Ariz. 327, 1903 Ariz. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-maricopa-canal-co-ariz-1903.