Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.

71 P. 1124, 8 Ariz. 327, 1903 Ariz. LEXIS 90
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 Ariz. 429
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided March 20, 1903·No. Civil No. 794·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

This was an action brought by the appellee corporation against Martin Gould and three other defendants owning lands lying under the Maricopa Canal in Maricopa County to enjoin and restrain said defendants from entering upon said canal, interfering with the headgates therein, or in any manner obstructing the appellee in the operation and management of its said canal and headgates. The case involves the same questions as that of Hayois v. Salt River Canal Co., (decided at the present term), ante, p. 285, 71 Pac. 944. Por the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment here appealed from is also affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co., 71 P. 1124, 8 Ariz. 327, 1903 Ariz. LEXIS 90 (Ark. 1903).

71 P. 1124 (Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayois v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.
71 P. 944 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1903)