Gould v. Kerwick

New York Court of Appeals

Gould v. Kerwick

443 N.E.2d 948, 57 N.Y.2d 1012, 457 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3853

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 11, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 443 N.E.2d 948 (Gould v. Kerwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gould v. Kerwick, 443 N.E.2d 948, 57 N.Y.2d 1012, 457 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3853 (N.Y. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), [1016]*1016order reversed, with costs, and the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Ulster County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 917, 919-920). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), [1016]*1016order reversed, with costs, and the judgment and order of Supreme Court, Ulster County, reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division (87 AD2d 917, 919-920). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 N.E.2d 948, 57 N.Y.2d 1012, 457 N.Y.S.2d 474, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-kerwick-ny-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack