Gould v. Hyde Park Water Co.
243 U.S. 630, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1590
This text of 243 U.S. 630 (Gould v. Hyde Park Water Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gould v. Hyde Park Water Co., 243 U.S. 630, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1590 (1917).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
243 U.S. 630, 37 S. Ct. 477, 61 L. Ed. 938, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-hyde-park-water-co-scotus-1917.