Gould v. Gould

2 Aik. 180
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Aik. 180 (Gould v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gould v. Gould, 2 Aik. 180 (Vt. 1827).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Here is only the confession of the petitionee, that he should have to father the child. The confession or admission of the party alone, has never been deemed sufficient evidence of the fact of adultery for the purpose of a divorce. Other circumstances must be shown, such as improper familiarities between the parties. Ip cases of alienated affections, collusion, for the purposes of a separation, is to be apprehended. The publick have a deep interest in the preservation of marital contracts. Proof, therefore, which from its nature and character, leaves no reasonable doubt upon the mind, of the truth of the charge, must be furnished, before a bill of divorce can be granted.

Prayer of the petition refused.

On motion of the petitioner, the case was continued on the docket of the court, for further proofs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindley v. Lindley
68 Vt. 421 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Aik. 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-gould-vt-1827.