Gould v. Dixon

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 2024
Docket1D2024-2340
StatusPublished

This text of Gould v. Dixon (Gould v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gould v. Dixon, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2024-2340 _____________________________

GEORGE M. GOULD,

Petitioner,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

December 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.

ROBERTS, NORDBY, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ George M. Gould, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gould v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2024.