Gould v. Davis

First Circuit

Gould v. Davis

75 F. 424, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2047

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJune 30, 1896

DocketNos. 164 and 165

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 75 F. 424 (Gould v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gould v. Davis, 75 F. 424, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2047 (1st Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the conclusion of the district court that the steamship Louisburg was in fault in running at too high a rate of speed in the fog, which we iind to have been at: least seven knots an hour through the water. As this is the only question raised on these appeals, our decree in each case is: The decree of the district court is affirmed, with interest, and with costs for the appellees in this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the conclusion of the district court that the steamship Louisburg was in fault in running at too high a rate of speed in the fog, which we iind to have been at: least seven knots an hour through the water. As this is the only question raised on these appeals, our decree in each case is: The decree of the district court is affirmed, with interest, and with costs for the appellees in this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 F. 424, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-davis-ca1-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack