Gould v. City of Newport News

Fourth Circuit

Gould v. City of Newport News

404 F. App'x 716

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 6, 2010·No. No. 10-6893·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gould v. City of Newport News, No. 2:10-cv-00286-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. June 23, 2010). We deny Gould’s motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kelvin Gould appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gould v. City of Newport News, No. 2:10-cv-00286-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. June 23, 2010). We deny Gould’s motions for discovery and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gould v. City of Newport News, 404 F. App'x 716 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

404 F. App'x 716 (Gould v. City of Newport News) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related