Gould v. Bugbee
This text of 72 Mass. 371 (Gould v. Bugbee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence offered by the plaintiffs, to show when the canal and other works were completed; to show the failure to pay the rent, according to the lease, after such completion ; to prove the entry upon the premises by the plaintiffs, for such failure to pay rent and for a forfeiture, should have been admitted. For, though the defendants were relievable in equity, the proof of the facts before stated would enable the plaintiffs to maintain an action at law for damages for using the estate, and for waste of water after such default by defendants and entry of the plaintiffs.
The provision as to waste, in the indenture, is a covenant and not a condition. For any waste before the entry, the plain* tiffs must rely upon their covenants ; for waste after such entry damages may be recovered in this suit.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 Mass. 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gould-v-bugbee-mass-1856.