Gouge v. Penn America Insurance

166 F. App'x 34
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 24, 2006
DocketNo. 05-1907
StatusPublished

This text of 166 F. App'x 34 (Gouge v. Penn America Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gouge v. Penn America Insurance, 166 F. App'x 34 (4th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dreama Gouge appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gouge v. Penn America Ins. Co., No. CA-04-1083-2, 2005 WL 1639291 (S.D.W.Va. July 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 F. App'x 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gouge-v-penn-america-insurance-ca4-2006.