Gouge v. Hart
251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 179
Opinion
Dismissed for want of
jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U, S. 352, 353; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. [543]*543Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372; Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Sarda Fe Ry. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99. Mr. J. S. Ashworth, with whom Mr. H. G. Peters was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gouge v. Hart, 251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 179 (1920).
251 U.S. 542 (Gouge v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Courtney v. Pradt
196 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
240 U.S. 97 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
234 U.S. 369 (Supreme Court, 1914)