Gouge v. Hart

251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 179
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 19, 1920·No. No. 136·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of

jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U, S. 352, 353; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. [543]*543Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372; Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Sarda Fe Ry. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99. Mr. J. S. Ashworth, with whom Mr. H. G. Peters was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gouge v. Hart, 251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 179 (1920).

251 U.S. 542 (Gouge v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Courtney v. Pradt
196 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
240 U.S. 97 (Supreme Court, 1916)