Gouge v. Hart

Supreme Court

Gouge v. Hart

251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 179

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 19, 1920

DocketNo. 136

StatusPublished

This text of 251 U.S. 542 (Gouge v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gouge v. Hart, 251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 179 (1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of

jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U, S. 352, 353; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. [543]*543Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372; Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Sarda Fe Ry. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99. Mr. J. S. Ashworth, with whom Mr. H. G. Peters was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of

jurisdiction upon the authority of Courtney v. Pradt, 196 U. S. 89, 91; Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry. Co., 233 U, S. 352, 353; Louisville & Nashville R. R. Co. v. [543]*543Western Union Telegraph Co., 234 U. S. 369, 371-372; Male v. Atchison, Topeka & Sarda Fe Ry. Co., 240 U. S. 97, 99. Mr. J. S. Ashworth, with whom Mr. H. G. Peters was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Frierson, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 U.S. 542, 40 S. Ct. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gouge-v-hart-scotus-1920.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack