Gottschalk v. Jungman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gottschalk v. Jungman

79 N.Y.S. 1133

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 9, 1903·Published

Opinion

HATCH. J.

The above-entitled action is precisely similar to the case of Gottschalk v. Jungmann (handed down herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 551, the only difference being that it is another mortgage upon other .premises; but the facts governing the -rights of the parties are the same as in the other case, and the judgment should be the same, and it calls for a reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

INGRAHAM and LAUGHLIN, JJ„ concur. VAN BRUNT, P. J., and PATTERSON, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HATCH. J.

The above-entitled action is precisely similar to the case of Gottschalk v. Jungmann (handed down herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 551, the only difference being that it is another mortgage upon other .premises; but the facts governing the -rights of the parties are the same as in the other case, and the judgment should be the same, and it calls for a reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

INGRAHAM and LAUGHLIN, JJ„ concur. VAN BRUNT, P. J., and PATTERSON, J., dissent.

Gottschalk v. Jungman, 79 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

79 N.Y.S. 1133 (Gottschalk v. Jungman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related