Gottschalk v. Jungman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gottschalk v. Jungman

79 N.Y.S. 1133

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 79 N.Y.S. 1133 (Gottschalk v. Jungman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gottschalk v. Jungman, 79 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

HATCH. J.

The above-entitled action is precisely similar to the case of Gottschalk v. Jungmann (handed down herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 551, the only difference being that it is another mortgage upon other .premises; but the facts governing the -rights of the parties are the same as in the other case, and the judgment should be the same, and it calls for a reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

INGRAHAM and LAUGHLIN, JJ„ concur. VAN BRUNT, P. J., and PATTERSON, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HATCH. J.

The above-entitled action is precisely similar to the case of Gottschalk v. Jungmann (handed down herewith) 79 N. Y. Supp. 551, the only difference being that it is another mortgage upon other .premises; but the facts governing the -rights of the parties are the same as in the other case, and the judgment should be the same, and it calls for a reversal of the judgment and the granting of a new trial, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

INGRAHAM and LAUGHLIN, JJ„ concur. VAN BRUNT, P. J., and PATTERSON, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottschalk-v-jungman-nyappdiv-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack