Gottschalk v. First Contact LLC

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedOctober 26, 2020
Docket2:20-cv-01307
StatusUnknown

This text of Gottschalk v. First Contact LLC (Gottschalk v. First Contact LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gottschalk v. First Contact LLC, (D. Nev. 2020).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 REBECCA GOTTSCHALK, Case No. 2:20-CV-1307 JCM (DJA)

8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER

9 v.

10 FIRST CONTACT LLC,

11 Defendant(s).

12 13 Presently before the court is defendant First Contact LLC’s (“First Contact”) motion 14 to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff Rebecca Gottschalk did 15 not respond prior to First Contact’s notice of suggestion on pendency of bankruptcy and 16 automatic stay of proceedings. (ECF No. 10). 17 Gottschalk alleges that debt collector First Contact called her 424 times from October 18 to December 2018, in violation of the TCPA, FDCPA, and Nevada state law, to collect on a 19 debt she owed to Credit One Bank. (Compl., ECF No. 1 at 5). First Contact moved to 20 dismiss this case under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) on September 9, 2020. (ECF No. 7). On 21 September 11, 2020, First Contact filed a notice of suggestion on pendency of bankruptcy 22 and automatic stay of proceedings, informing the court that iQor Holdings Inc. and twenty- 23 two of its U.S. affiliates—including First Contact—filed voluntary petitions under Chapter 24 11 of Title 11, Section 362 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. (ECF No. 10). 25 Under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a), the filing of a bankruptcy petition automatically stays “the 26 commencement or continuation . . . of a judicial, administrative, or other action or 27 proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the 28 commencement of the [bankruptcy] case.” 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). The statute also stays “any act to collect, assess, or recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the commencement of the [bankruptcy case].” Jd. at § 362(a)(6). The scope of the automatic 3 | stay is to be broadly construed, and exemptions to the stay are to be narrowly construed. 4| Burton v. Infinity Capital Mgmt., 862 F.3d 740, 746-47 (9th Cir. 2017); Sternberg v. Johnston, 595 F.3d 937, 943 (9th Cir. 2010). 6 Accordingly, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that defendant First 8 | Contact LLC’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 7) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the instant action is STAYED pending the final resolution of In re iQor Holdings Inc., Case No. 20-34500 (DRJ), in the United States 12} Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas. First Contact LLC shall notify the 13 | court within 30 days after the automatic stay is lifted. 14 DATED October 26, 2020. 15 tis ©. Atala 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

es C. Mahan District Judge _2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sternberg v. Johnston
595 F.3d 937 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Freddy Burton v. Infinity Capital Management
862 F.3d 740 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gottschalk v. First Contact LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottschalk-v-first-contact-llc-nvd-2020.