Gottlieb v. Saf-T-Clean, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Gottlieb v. Saf-T-Clean, Inc.

197 So. 2d 818

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 22, 1967

DocketNo. 35374

StatusPublished

This text of 197 So. 2d 818 (Gottlieb v. Saf-T-Clean, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gottlieb v. Saf-T-Clean, Inc., 197 So. 2d 818 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We conclude, upon consideration of the record and issues presented, that the compensation order must be quashed and the cause remanded to the deputy for reconsideration, the taking of further evidence if necessary and entry of a new compensation, order in accordance with the opinions of this Court in Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, opinion filed January 25, 1967, and Evans v. Florida Industrial Commission, 196 So.2d 748, opinion filed February 1, 1967.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We conclude, upon consideration of the record and issues presented, that the compensation order must be quashed and the cause remanded to the deputy for reconsideration, the taking of further evidence if necessary and entry of a new compensation, order in accordance with the opinions of this Court in Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, opinion filed January 25, 1967, and Evans v. Florida Industrial Commission, 196 So.2d 748, opinion filed February 1, 1967.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., THOMAS, DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., and JOHNSON, District Court Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 So. 2d 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottlieb-v-saf-t-clean-inc-fla-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack