Gottlieb v. New York Life Insurance

136 Misc. 194, 240 N.Y.S. 568, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1096
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided March 13, 1930·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The policy providing for disability compensation and waiver of premiums upon proof of total and permanent disability, or where such proof establishes that the insured is, and for a period of not less than three consecutive months immediately preceding receipt of proof has been totally disabled,” it was not a compliance with the contract to offer proof of disability one year after the disability had ceased, and plaintiff’s ignorance of the provision entitling him to compensation is no excuse for failure to comply with the terms of the contract. (Whiteside v. No. American Acc. Ins. Co., 200 N. Y. 320; Hanna v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Assn., 204 App. Div. 258; affd., 236 N. Y. 571.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismisse'd on the merits, with costs.

All concur; present, Lydon, Callahan and Peters, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gottlieb v. New York Life Insurance, 136 Misc. 194, 240 N.Y.S. 568, 1930 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

136 Misc. 194 (Gottlieb v. New York Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aufiero v. New York Life Insurance
274 A.D. 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Reed v. New York Life Insurance
268 N.W. 290 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1936)
Rose v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.
187 N.E. 859 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1933)
Kasarsky v. New York Life Insurance
145 Misc. 732 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1932)
Dean v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
165 S.E. 235 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Rose v. New York Life Insurance
13 Ohio Law. Abs. 233 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1932)