Gottlieb v. Mirabal.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gottlieb v. Mirabal.

126 A.D.2d 444, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41593

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gottlieb v. Mirabal.. Read the opinion of the Court — 123 A.D.2d 574 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1987·Published

Opinion

Motion granted wherein it seeks reargument and, upon reargument, the following sentence is added to the last line of the final paragraph of the memorandum decision accompanying this court’s order [123 AD2d 574], entered on October 21, 1986, and to the last line of the decretal paragraph of such order: "We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, and find that they are lacking in merit.” The motion is otherwise denied. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted wherein it seeks reargument and, upon reargument, the following sentence is added to the last line of the final paragraph of the memorandum decision accompanying this court’s order [123 AD2d 574], entered on October 21, 1986, and to the last line of the decretal paragraph of such order: "We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions, and find that they are lacking in merit.” The motion is otherwise denied. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Gottlieb v. Mirabal., 126 A.D.2d 444, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 41593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

126 A.D.2d 444 (Gottlieb v. Mirabal.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.