Gottlieb v. Matckin

117 Misc. 128
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1921
StatusPublished

This text of 117 Misc. 128 (Gottlieb v. Matckin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gottlieb v. Matckin, 117 Misc. 128 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1921).

Opinion

Guy, J.

Uninterrupted delivery of the milk supply to the people of this city is so vital for the [129]*129preservation of the general health of the community, and especially children and invalids, that any organized effort to interfere therewith must be regarded as an act of hostility to the public weal and such an unlawful purpose as calls for the exercise of the full authority of the courts and police authorities. Whatever may be the right or wrong of the present wage controversy, the health of this entire community cannot be made subservient thereto. Picketing and other acts alleged against the defendants have been held not to be unlawful under ordinary conditions, but when linked with a purpose inimical to the welfare of the community they become unlawful. This court would hesitate in an ordinary wage dispute to grant the relief asked for herein, but feels that it is its duty to assert the full power of the court under the circumstances to protect the lives and health of the people of New York. The motion to restrain the defendants is therefore granted, with notice to the defendants that any disobedience of the order herein will be visited with the fullest measure of punishment within the power of this court.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 Misc. 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottlieb-v-matckin-nysupct-1921.