Gottlieb v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gottlieb v. Goldberg

257 A.D. 970, 13 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8740

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 970 (Gottlieb v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gottlieb v. Goldberg, 257 A.D. 970, 13 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

On appeal by plaintiff from a resettled order permitting defendant to serve an amended answer pleading a release as a defense, in an action for damages for personal injuries, order modified by adding at the end thereof the words, “ this action to retain its place on the calendar, without prejudice to the right of either party to a reasonable adjournment of the trial in the discretion of the justice calling the calendar.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Amended answer to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The defendant is entitled to interpose the amended pleading. The legal effect of the pleaded release will be determined at the trial in the light of the proofs thereon adduced. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeal by plaintiff from a resettled order permitting defendant to serve an amended answer pleading a release as a defense, in an action for damages for personal injuries, order modified by adding at the end thereof the words, “ this action to retain its place on the calendar, without prejudice to the right of either party to a reasonable adjournment of the trial in the discretion of the justice calling the calendar.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. Amended answer to be served within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The defendant is entitled to interpose the amended pleading. The legal effect of the pleaded release will be determined at the trial in the light of the proofs thereon adduced. Lazansky, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 970, 13 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottlieb-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1939.