Gottlieb v. Glazier

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Gottlieb v. Glazier

25 Misc. 765, 54 N.Y.S. 1020

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1898

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Misc. 765 (Gottlieb v. Glazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gottlieb v. Glazier, 25 Misc. 765, 54 N.Y.S. 1020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The action being on contract, i. e., a judgment, and not in tort as upon the original cause of action, the plaintiff was not entitled to an execution against the person, and the justice, therefore, properly refused to insert such a provision in the judgment under review. - Gutta Percha Co. v. Mayor, 108 N. Y. 276.

The judgment must, therefore, be affirmed, with costs.

Present: Beekmae, P. J., Gildebsleeve and Gieqebich, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI