Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
414 A.2d 544, 82 N.J. 478, 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1323
Opinion
The judgment is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kole in the Appellate Division, reported at 173 N.J.Super. 381 (1979).
For reversal —Justices SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHRIEBER and HANDLER — 5.
For affirmance — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 414 A.2d 544, 82 N.J. 478, 1980 N.J. LEXIS 1323 (N.J. 1980).
414 A.2d 544 (Gottfried v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
THE ESTATE OF AMIR BOTROS v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE GROUP
D. New Jersey, 2020
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Mastroianni v. UNUM Prov. Corp., Paul Revere Life
286 F. Supp. 2d 425 (D. New Jersey, 2003)
Gamino v. General American Life Insurance
671 A.2d 1108 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Spears v. Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark, New Jersey
866 S.W.2d 544 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1993)
Lang, Neil and Linda Lang v. New York Life Insurance Company, a New York Corporation
721 F.2d 118 (Third Circuit, 1983)
Lang v. New York Life Insurance
581 F. Supp. 1 (D. New Jersey, 1982)