Gottesman Co. v. Keystone Enterprises, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gottesman Co. v. Keystone Enterprises, Inc.

19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 21, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.3d 250 (Gottesman Co. v. Keystone Enterprises, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gottesman Co. v. Keystone Enterprises, Inc., 19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered January 14, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in refusing to impose sanctions. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Ellerin and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered January 14, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in refusing to impose sanctions. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Ellerin and Catterson, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottesman-co-v-keystone-enterprises-inc-nyappdiv-2005.