Gottesman Co. v. Keystone Enterprises, Inc.
19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Edward Ramos, J.), entered January 14, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion in refusing to impose sanctions. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Ellerin and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gottesman Co. v. Keystone Enterprises, Inc., 19 A.D.3d 250, 796 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).
19 A.D.3d 250 (Gottesman Co. v. Keystone Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.