Gott v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES

723 So. 2d 936, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 305, 1999 WL 17789
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1999·No. 98-718·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

723 So.2d 936 (1999)

Ida GOTT and L.D. Gott, Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, YOUTH & FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.

No. 98-718.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 20, 1999.

Metcalfe & Metcalfe and George L. Metcalfe, Coral Gables; Ada G. Llerena, for appellants.

Robin H. Greene, Miami; Nancy Schleifer and Richard Hong, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The maternal grandparents of a dependent child seek review of the denial of their motion for visitation. We treat the present, unauthorized appeal as an application for certiorari, see Department of Health and Rehabilitative Serv. v. Honeycutt, 609 So.2d 596 (Fla.1992), and deny relief on the ground that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the proposed visitation was not in the best interest of the child. § 39.509, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gott v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES, 723 So. 2d 936, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 305, 1999 WL 17789 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

723 So. 2d 936 (Gott v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

S.P. v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services
17 So. 3d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
McGillis v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services
826 So. 2d 1028 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)