Gott v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES
This text of 723 So. 2d 936 (Gott v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN YOUTH & FAMILIES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ida GOTT and L.D. Gott, Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN, YOUTH & FAMILIES, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Metcalfe & Metcalfe and George L. Metcalfe, Coral Gables; Ada G. Llerena, for appellants.
Robin H. Greene, Miami; Nancy Schleifer and Richard Hong, Miami, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and JORGENSON and GERSTEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The maternal grandparents of a dependent child seek review of the denial of their motion for visitation. We treat the present, unauthorized appeal as an application for certiorari, see Department of Health and Rehabilitative Serv. v. Honeycutt, 609 So.2d 596 (Fla.1992), and deny relief on the ground that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the proposed visitation was not in the best interest of the child. § 39.509, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998).
Certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
723 So. 2d 936, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 305, 1999 WL 17789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gott-v-dept-of-children-youth-families-fladistctapp-1999.