Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.

258 A.D. 884, 16 N.Y.S.2d 238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 884 (Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gotham Silk Hosiery Co. v. Reynolds Metals Co., 258 A.D. 884, 16 N.Y.S.2d 238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The cross-complaint against the eodefendant Reynolds Metals Company, Incorporated, is legally sufficient and was properly interposed.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the defendant-respondent, and the motion to strike out the cross-complaint denied.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the defendant-respondent, and motion to strike out the cross-complaint denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore and Callahan, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The cross-complaint against the eodefendant Reynolds Metals Company, Incorporated, is legally sufficient and was properly interposed.

The order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the defendant-respondent, and the motion to strike out the cross-complaint denied.

Order reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant against the defendant-respondent, and motion to strike out the cross-complaint denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore and Callahan, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 884, 16 N.Y.S.2d 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gotham-silk-hosiery-co-v-reynolds-metals-co-nyappdiv-1939.