Gostin v. Gostin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gostin v. Gostin

51 A.D.2d 957

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 29, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 957 (Gostin v. Gostin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gostin v. Gostin, 51 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on April 8, 1975, insofar as it denied defendant’s application for counsel fees and disbursements, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting a counsel fee in the sum of $1,500, inclusive of all past disbursements, counsel fees for this appeal and any costs or disbursements of this appeal. Neither the extent, nor the value of the services rendered by defendant’s attorney, commencing in late July, 1973, and running through and including the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, has been controverted by plaintiff. Nor does it appear that plaintiff is unable to pay this sum, which we believe to be reasonable for the successful services rendered to his former wife. We are of the view that the amount indicated above is adequate under the circumstances disclosed in the record. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on April 8, 1975, insofar as it denied defendant’s application for counsel fees and disbursements, unanimously modified, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting a counsel fee in the sum of $1,500, inclusive of all past disbursements, counsel fees for this appeal and any costs or disbursements of this appeal. Neither the extent, nor the value of the services rendered by defendant’s attorney, commencing in late July, 1973, and running through and including the motion to confirm the Referee’s report, has been controverted by plaintiff. Nor does it appear that plaintiff is unable to pay this sum, which we believe to be reasonable for the successful services rendered to his former wife. We are of the view that the amount indicated above is adequate under the circumstances disclosed in the record. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gostin-v-gostin-nyappdiv-1976.