Gossett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gossett v. State

135 S.E. 520, 36 Ga. App. 123, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 816

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 9, 1926

Docket17610

StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 520 (Gossett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gossett v. State, 135 S.E. 520, 36 Ga. App. 123, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 816 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of violating the prohibition statute, his motion for a new trial was overruled, and he sued out a bill of exceptions, assigning error upon the verdict, as being contrary to evidence, and upon the failure of the court to charge on impeachment of witnesses, but failed to except to the judgment overruling his motion for a new trial. This court, therefore, has no jurisdiction to entertain the ease.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloodwortli, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of violating the prohibition statute, his motion for a new trial was overruled, and he sued out a bill of exceptions, assigning error upon the verdict, as being contrary to evidence, and upon the failure of the court to charge on impeachment of witnesses, but failed to except to the judgment overruling his motion for a new trial. This court, therefore, has no jurisdiction to entertain the ease.

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., concurs. Bloodwortli, J., absent on account of illness.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.E. 520, 36 Ga. App. 123, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gossett-v-state-gactapp-1926.