Gossett & Son v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gossett & Son v. Bishop

75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 487, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 73

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 24, 1912

Docket3728

StatusPublished

This text of 75 S.E. 816 (Gossett & Son v. Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gossett & Son v. Bishop, 75 S.E. 816, 11 Ga. App. 487, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 73 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

The evidence being undisputed that the plaintiff had not complied with the requirements of section 1771 of the Civil Code (1910), relating to the registration of commercial fertilizers, before making the sale to the defendant, the verdict for the defendant was demanded; and the errors in the instructions to the jury, of which complaint is. made in the amended motion for new trial, are immaterial. Penal Code (1910), § 643; Zipperer v. Doyle, 124 Ga. 895 (53 S. E. 505).

Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from city court of Zebulon — Judge Dupree. September 4, 1911.

E. M. Owen, William E. Beck, for plaintiff. J. T. Allen, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI