Gosselin v. National Aviation Underwriters

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gosselin v. National Aviation Underwriters

365 A.2d 194, 71 N.J. 351, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 154

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedOctober 19, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 365 A.2d 194 (Gosselin v. National Aviation Underwriters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gosselin v. National Aviation Underwriters, 365 A.2d 194, 71 N.J. 351, 1976 N.J. LEXIS 154 (N.J. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

Under the Supplemental Findings of Fact by the trial judge rendered pursuant to our special order of remand it must be concluded that the defendant has established a case of material misrepresentation of fact by plaintiff warranting a judgment of rescission of the policy. Accordingly the judgment of the Appellate Division is

Affirmed.

For affirmance—Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman, Clifford and Schreiber and Judge Conford—6.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI