Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co.

D.C. Circuit

Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co.

115 F. App'x 93

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 15, 2004

DocketNo. 04-7004

StatusPublished

This text of 115 F. App'x 93 (Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co., 115 F. App'x 93 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the briefs of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the briefs of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 F. App'x 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gossard-v-washington-gas-light-co-cadc-2004.