Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co.

D.C. Circuit

Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co.

115 F. App'x 93

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 15, 2004·No. No. 04-7004·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the briefs of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the briefs of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co., 115 F. App'x 93 (D.C. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

115 F. App'x 93 (Gossard v. Washington Gas Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.