Goss v. Whitney

27 Vt. 272
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedFebruary 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 27 Vt. 272 (Goss v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goss v. Whitney, 27 Vt. 272 (Vt. 1855).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bennett, J.

Under the charge of the court, it must be assumed that the jury found that the note in question, was not only signed upon the Sabbath, but that it was absolutely and unconditionally delivered to Goss on the same Sabbath day, or to his agent, which is the same thing in legal effect. The case shows that evidence was given tending to prove such to have been the fact.

The jury were correctly instructed that if the note was not delivered until Monday, or if delivered on the Sabbath, and there was a subsequent promise to pay it, their verdict should be for the plaintiff. If the plaintiff has been wrongfully cast in the suit, it would seem to have been the fault of the jury, against which we cannot relieve.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bryant v. Booze
55 Ga. 438 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1875)
Hamilton v. Gridley
54 Barb. 542 (New York Supreme Court, 1868)
Raines v. Watson
2 W. Va. 371 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1868)
Smith v. Foster
41 N.H. 215 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 Vt. 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goss-v-whitney-vt-1855.