Goss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Goss v. State

95 S.W.2d 692, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 730

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 10, 1936

DocketNo. 18454

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.W.2d 692 (Goss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goss v. State, 95 S.W.2d 692, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 730 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for aggravated assault, punishment assessed being a fine of $50 and sixty days’ confinement in jail.

Appellant was charged by indictment with assault with intent to murder one Joe Carden. Upon the trial conviction for aggravated assault resulted with the punishment as heretofore indicated.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception, save certain exceptions to the charge of the court. It is impossible, of course, to appraise them in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for aggravated assault, punishment assessed being a fine of $50 and sixty days’ confinement in jail.

Appellant was charged by indictment with assault with intent to murder one Joe Carden. Upon the trial conviction for aggravated assault resulted with the punishment as heretofore indicated.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception, save certain exceptions to the charge of the court. It is impossible, of course, to appraise them in the absence of a statement of facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.W.2d 692, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goss-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.