Goss v. Spencer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Goss v. Spencer

98 A. 616, 253 Pa. 363, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 845

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 17, 1916

DocketAppeal, No. 369

StatusPublished

This text of 98 A. 616 (Goss v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goss v. Spencer, 98 A. 616, 253 Pa. 363, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 845 (Pa. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Jennie B. Spencer died testate seized in fee of the real estate in question which she devised to her daughter, Helen L. Goss, 'the plaintiff in this action of ejectment. The defendant was the husband of Jennie B. Spencer, and claims that he elected to take the real estate as tenant by the curtesy and is so holding it. The plaintiff contends that the defendant forfeited his estate by the curtesy by claiming title to the land in fee, and further that he elected to take against the will of his wife the one-third of the personal estate absolutely and a life interest in the one-third of her real estate. These were questions of fact, and having been properly submitted to the jury under competent evidence in a charge to which error is not assigned, the verdict for the defendant establishes his right to the possession of the premises, and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Jennie B. Spencer died testate seized in fee of the real estate in question which she devised to her daughter, Helen L. Goss, 'the plaintiff in this action of ejectment. The defendant was the husband of Jennie B. Spencer, and claims that he elected to take the real estate as tenant by the curtesy and is so holding it. The plaintiff contends that the defendant forfeited his estate by the curtesy by claiming title to the land in fee, and further that he elected to take against the will of his wife the one-third of the personal estate absolutely and a life interest in the one-third of her real estate. These were questions of fact, and having been properly submitted to the jury under competent evidence in a charge to which error is not assigned, the verdict for the defendant establishes his right to the possession of the premises, and, therefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 A. 616, 253 Pa. 363, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goss-v-spencer-pa-1916.