Goss v. Lovell

45 Colo. 315
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJanuary 15, 1909
DocketNo. 5889
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 45 Colo. 315 (Goss v. Lovell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goss v. Lovell, 45 Colo. 315 (Colo. 1909).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Hill

delivered the opinion, of the court:

This suit was instituted upon the 1st day of April, 1899, "by the filing of plaintiff’s complaint, and was consolidated for trial with No. 5888, Jesse B. Lovell v. Percy D. Goss and Ellen A. Goss; the trial was to the court without a jury, though separate judgments were entered in each case. In this case, the findings and judgments were against the plaintiff in error, from which he brings error.

This action was brought to recover from the plaintiff in error upon the same notes on which judgment was prayed in the other suit; this plaintiff in error being the.grantee in the deed from De Sollar to him whereby he assumed and agreed to pay a certain portion of the indebtedness evidenced by the notes. In this action the plaintiff in error pleaded, as a defense, the statute of limitations, as was done in the other case.

The two causes were tried upon the same evidence and at the same time. Precisely the same questions of fact and law are involved in both. The decision there controls here, and the judgment below, not’being in- accord with that opinion, is reversed and the cause remanded. • Reversed;

Decision en banc.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodge v. East
64 P.2d 1270 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Colo. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goss-v-lovell-colo-1909.