Goss v. Hays
This text of 40 A.D. 557 (Goss v. Hays) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As a matter of fact the costs in the Justicels Court in this case were not paid, and their payment is necessary to perfect an appeal. (Kenney v. Livery Stable Keepers' Assn., 89 Hun, 190.)
The circumstances, 'however, are -such that if" seems to me the County Court might well have permitted that to have been done, nwnc pro tnmc, under section 3049 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It has, however, declined to do so. It was a matter resting in its discretion, and there is a long line of authorities holding that we have not the right to review that exercise of discretion. (Tucker v. Pfau, 70 Hun, 59; Wright v. Chase, 77 id. 90; Myers v. Riley, 36 id. 20; Thomas v. Keeler, 52 id. 318; Bantleon v. Meier, 81 id. 162; People v. Young, 92 id. 373, 377; National Wall Paper Co. v. Szerlip, 9 App. Div. 206; Judson v. O'Connell, 37 N. Y. St. Repr. 581; Sexton v. Bennett, 43 id. 85.)
The only case that I have been able to find where the discretion of the County Court was overruled upon appeal is the case of Gutbrecht v. Pros. Park & C. I. R. R. Co. (28 Hun, 497).
There would seem to be no alternative, therefore, but to dismiss the appeal.
All concurred.
Appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disoursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 A.D. 557, 58 N.Y.S. 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goss-v-hays-nyappdiv-1899.