Goss v. Calkins
42 N.E. 96, 164 Mass. 546, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 285
Opinion
This case cannot be distinguished from Swett v. Southworth, 125 Mass. 417, where it was held that the defence of payment was open under an answer like that in the present case. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goss v. Calkins, 42 N.E. 96, 164 Mass. 546, 1895 Mass. LEXIS 285 (Mass. 1895).
42 N.E. 96 (Goss v. Calkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Powers v. Bunnell
140 N.W. 748 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1913)
Crilly v. Ruyle
127 N.W. 251 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1910)
Keys v. Fink
116 N.W. 162 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1908)