Gosman v. State

391 So. 2d 339, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17873
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gosman v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 16354
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1980·No. No. 79-1475·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment after a jury trial.' Defendant was found guilty of resisting arrest with violence and placed on three years’ probation. We affirm in all respects except conclude that the condition of probation whereby defendant was required to submit to searches by any authorized police officer is violative of the principles stated in Dearth v. State, 390 So.2d 108 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). We, therefore, strike the words, “and authorized police officers,” from the order and affirm the order as modified.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

ANSTEAD and HURLEY, JJ., concur. BERANEK, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gosman v. State, 391 So. 2d 339, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

391 So. 2d 339 (Gosman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dearth v. State
390 So. 2d 108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)