Goshen v. Mutual Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goshen v. Mutual Life Insurance

259 A.D.2d 360, 684 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2814

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 360 (Goshen v. Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goshen v. Mutual Life Insurance, 259 A.D.2d 360, 684 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2814 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered October 29, 1997, in an action arising out of defendants’ sale of life insurance policies utilizing the “vanishing premium” concept to the members of plaintiff class, dismissing the complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action is in all significant respects indistinguishable from Gaidon v Guardian Life Ins. Co. (255 AD2d 101), recent precedent that compels dismissal of these causes of action for common-law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, negligent supervision of sales personnel, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of General Business Law § 349. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered October 29, 1997, in an action arising out of defendants’ sale of life insurance policies utilizing the “vanishing premium” concept to the members of plaintiff class, dismissing the complaint with prejudice for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The action is in all significant respects indistinguishable from Gaidon v Guardian Life Ins. Co. (255 AD2d 101), recent precedent that compels dismissal of these causes of action for common-law fraud, negligent misrepresentation, negligent supervision of sales personnel, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of General Business Law § 349. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 360, 684 N.Y.S.2d 791, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goshen-v-mutual-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack