Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison
191 So. 2d 40
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing’ date April 28, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
Therefore, the petition for certiorari is hereby denied.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1966).
191 So. 2d 40 (Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Holl v. Talcott
191 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)