Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison

191 So. 2d 40
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1966
DocketNo. 35491
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 191 So. 2d 40 (Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gory Roofing Tile Manufacturing, Inc. v. Davison, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing’ date April 28, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

Therefore, the petition for certiorari is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holl v. Talcott
191 So. 2d 40 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 2d 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gory-roofing-tile-manufacturing-inc-v-davison-fla-1966.