Gorton v. Dodge County Mutual Insurance

39 Wis. 121
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1875·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Lyoít, J.

Tbe agreement contained in tbe note given for tbe premium is part of tbe contract of insurance; and tbe cases cited by tbe learned counsel for tbe defendant abundantly show that under such contract tbe liability of tbe defendant on tbe policy was absolutely suspended by tbe failure of tbe plaintiff to pay tbe note when due. Tbe note never having been paid, such liability was never restored; and tbe loss occurring after tbe plaintiff was thus in default, tbe defendant is not liable therefor. It is so held, and tbe reasons are sufficiently stated, in Joliffe v. Madison Mut. Ins. Co., ante, p. 111. Those reasons need not be repeated here.

Tbe portion of tbe answer demurred to states a perfect defense to tbe action; and tbe demurrer should have been overruled.

[124] By the Court. — Order reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorton v. Dodge County Mutual Insurance, 39 Wis. 121 (Wis. 1875).

39 Wis. 121 (Gorton v. Dodge County Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hiatt v. Union Mutual Casualty Co.
224 N.W. 53 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1929)
Stutzman v. Cicero Mutual Fire Insurance
136 N.W. 604 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1912)
McCullough v. Home Insurance Co.
118 Tenn. 263 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1906)
Ressler v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance
110 Tenn. 411 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1903)
Palmer v. Continental Insurance Co.
61 P. 784 (California Supreme Court, 1900)
New Zealand Insurance v. Maaz
13 Colo. App. 493 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1899)
Phenix Ins. v. Bachelder
49 N.W. 217 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1891)
Cohen v. Continental Fire Insurance
3 S.W. 296 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)