Gorter v. Industrial Acc. Commission

California Court of Appeal

Gorter v. Industrial Acc. Commission

169 P. 262, 35 Cal. App. 88, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 387

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 22, 1917

DocketCiv. No. 2226.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 169 P. 262 (Gorter v. Industrial Acc. Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gorter v. Industrial Acc. Commission, 169 P. 262, 35 Cal. App. 88, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 387 (Cal. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of review.

It is contended by petitioner that the applicant in whose favor an award was made by the Industrial Accident Commission was not in his employ but was working independently, although under an arrangement with petitioner by which the latter furnished him with the necessary tools and appliances for performing his work and received forty per cent of the amounts earned by the applicant. The respondent, Industrial Accident Commission, concluded from the evidence on the whole that the relation of employer and employee existed, and thereupon made its award. We are satisfied that the evidence sustains this conclusion, and for that reason the writ is dismissed and the award affirmed. *Page 89

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of review.

It is contended by petitioner that the applicant in whose favor an award was made by the Industrial Accident Commission was not in his employ but was working independently, although under an arrangement with petitioner by which the latter furnished him with the necessary tools and appliances for performing his work and received forty per cent of the amounts earned by the applicant. The respondent, Industrial Accident Commission, concluded from the evidence on the whole that the relation of employer and employee existed, and thereupon made its award. We are satisfied that the evidence sustains this conclusion, and for that reason the writ is dismissed and the award affirmed. *Page 89

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

169 P. 262, 35 Cal. App. 88, 1917 Cal. App. LEXIS 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorter-v-industrial-acc-commission-calctapp-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack