Gort v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Gort v. State

345 So. 2d 726, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3878

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1977

DocketNo. 50131

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 345 So. 2d 726 (Gort v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gort v. State, 345 So. 2d 726, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3878 (Fla. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

This case comes to us on direct appeal from judgments of the Orange County Circuit Court entered on pleas of no contest reserving the right to appeal. Among the issues raised is the denial by the circuit court of motions by the appellants to dismiss charges alleging violations of Section 796.07, Florida Statutes (1975), and upholding the constitutionality of the statute. We have jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b)(1) of the Florida Constitution, and we deny the state’s motion to quash the appeal.

After a careful review of the appellants’ brief and the record, we dispense with the filing of a brief by the state and oral argument. The judgments entered below are affirmed. State v. Bales, 343 So.2d 9 (Fla.1977).

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT.

This case comes to us on direct appeal from judgments of the Orange County Circuit Court entered on pleas of no contest reserving the right to appeal. Among the issues raised is the denial by the circuit court of motions by the appellants to dismiss charges alleging violations of Section 796.07, Florida Statutes (1975), and upholding the constitutionality of the statute. We have jurisdiction under Article V, Section 3(b)(1) of the Florida Constitution, and we deny the state’s motion to quash the appeal.

After a careful review of the appellants’ brief and the record, we dispense with the filing of a brief by the state and oral argument. The judgments entered below are affirmed. State v. Bales, 343 So.2d 9 (Fla.1977).

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 So. 2d 726, 1977 Fla. LEXIS 3878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gort-v-state-fla-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack