Gorslene v. Huck

763 N.E.2d 1184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 533
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 4, 2002
Docket01-2134
StatusPublished

This text of 763 N.E.2d 1184 (Gorslene v. Huck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gorslene v. Huck, 763 N.E.2d 1184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 533 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Licking App. No. 01CA40.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
763 N.E.2d 1184, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1485, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorslene-v-huck-ohio-2002.