Gorsky v. Gorsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gorsky v. Gorsky

123 A.D.2d 601, 506 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60750

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 6, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.2d 601 (Gorsky v. Gorsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gorsky v. Gorsky, 123 A.D.2d 601, 506 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated June 3, 1985, which granted the defendant wife a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, and ancillary relief.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The court properly set forth the factors it considered in reaching its conclusions. Based on the record before us, we find no basis to disturb the court’s decision to grant the defendant wife a divorce on her counterclaim (see, e.g., Patten v Nagy, 99 AD2d 801). Further, the amount of child support and counsel fees awarded was a proper exercise of discretion and will not be disturbed (see, e.g., Ritz v Ritz, 103 AD2d 802; Kapuscinski v Kapuscinski, 75 AD2d 576).

[602]*602The plaintiffs remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated June 3, 1985, which granted the defendant wife a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, and ancillary relief.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The court properly set forth the factors it considered in reaching its conclusions. Based on the record before us, we find no basis to disturb the court’s decision to grant the defendant wife a divorce on her counterclaim (see, e.g., Patten v Nagy, 99 AD2d 801). Further, the amount of child support and counsel fees awarded was a proper exercise of discretion and will not be disturbed (see, e.g., Ritz v Ritz, 103 AD2d 802; Kapuscinski v Kapuscinski, 75 AD2d 576).

[602]*602The plaintiffs remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.2d 601, 506 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorsky-v-gorsky-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack