Gorsky v. Gorsky

123 A.D.2d 601, 506 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60750

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Miller, J.), dated June 3, 1985, which granted the defendant wife a divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment, and ancillary relief.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

The court properly set forth the factors it considered in reaching its conclusions. Based on the record before us, we find no basis to disturb the court’s decision to grant the defendant wife a divorce on her counterclaim (see, e.g., Patten v Nagy, 99 AD2d 801). Further, the amount of child support and counsel fees awarded was a proper exercise of discretion and will not be disturbed (see, e.g., Ritz v Ritz, 103 AD2d 802; Kapuscinski v Kapuscinski, 75 AD2d 576).

[602] The plaintiffs remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorsky v. Gorsky, 123 A.D.2d 601, 506 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60750 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

123 A.D.2d 601 (Gorsky v. Gorsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kapuscinski v. Kapuscinski
75 A.D.2d 576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Patten v. Nagy
99 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Ritz v. Ritz
103 A.D.2d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)