Gorschen v. Ivan-Reen Realty Corporation
This text of 59 N.E.2d 33 (Gorschen v. Ivan-Reen Realty Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Refusal of the mortgagor to pay a higher rate of interest than that specified in the extension agreement after the expiration of the extension furnished no ground for foreclosure of the mortgage (Brighton Operating Corp. v. Morrison, 291 N. Y. 6). No other question is open for our consideration.
The judgments should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts.
Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.
Judgments reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 N.E.2d 33, 293 N.Y. 794, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorschen-v-ivan-reen-realty-corporation-ny-1944.