Gorschen v. Ivan-Reen Realty Corporation

59 N.E.2d 33, 293 N.Y. 794, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2223
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 1944·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Refusal of the mortgagor to pay a higher rate of interest than that specified in the extension agreement after the expiration of the extension furnished no ground for foreclosure of the mortgage (Brighton Operating Corp. v. Morrison, 291 N. Y. 6). No other question is open for our consideration.

The judgments should be reversed and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts.

Lehman, Ch. J., Loughran, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorschen v. Ivan-Reen Realty Corporation, 59 N.E.2d 33, 293 N.Y. 794, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 2223 (N.Y. 1944).

59 N.E.2d 33 (Gorschen v. Ivan-Reen Realty Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brighton Operating Corp. v. Morrison
50 N.E.2d 283 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)