Gorrell v. Snow

31 Ind. 215
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1869
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 31 Ind. 215 (Gorrell v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gorrell v. Snow, 31 Ind. 215 (Ind. 1869).

Opinion

Erazeb, J.

The only question before us is, did the court below err in overruling a demurrer to the second paragraph of the complaint? The action was for malicious prosecution, and that paragraph failed to aver that the prosecution claimed to have been malicious had terminated in the plaintiff’s acquittal or discharge. For this omission the appellant insists that the paragraph was had. So are the authorities. 1 Chit. PI. 679; Whitworth v. Hall, 2 B. & Ad. 695.

Reversed and í-emánded, with direction to sustain the demurx’er.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitesell v. Study
76 N.E. 1010 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1906)
Stark v. Bindley
52 N.E. 804 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1899)
Lytton v. Baird
95 Ind. 349 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Gillespie v. Hudson
11 Kan. 163 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1873)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ind. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorrell-v-snow-ind-1869.