Gorrell v. Gorrell

127 A. 346, 97 N.J. Eq. 367, 12 Stock. 367, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 539
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 19, 1925·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appeal from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.

For affirmance—The Ciiiee'-Justice, Trbnchard, Parker, Minturn, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 14.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorrell v. Gorrell, 127 A. 346, 97 N.J. Eq. 367, 12 Stock. 367, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 539 (N.J. 1925).

127 A. 346 (Gorrell v. Gorrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shayegan v. Baldwin
9 N.J. Tax 452 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1987)
Hiestand v. Geier
396 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. Turro
120 A.2d 52 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Weisberg v. Koprowski
111 A.2d 481 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1955)
Strong v. Strong
36 A.2d 410 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Mountford v. Mountford
29 A.2d 258 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1942)
Kartun v. Kartun
180 N.E. 423 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1932)
Marker v. Marker
143 A. 830 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)