Gorrasi v. Vigliotti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gorrasi v. Vigliotti

278 A.D.2d 275, 718 N.Y.S.2d 212, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 275 (Gorrasi v. Vigliotti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gorrasi v. Vigliotti, 278 A.D.2d 275, 718 N.Y.S.2d 212, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover payment on promissory notes, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered December 30, 1999, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of the same court (Gibson, R.), entered May 28, 1999, in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $28,200, upon his default in appearing at trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate a judgment entered upon a default, the movant must establish a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action (see, CPLR 5015 [a]; Barbagallo v Nationalise Exterminating & Deodorizing, 260 AD2d 518; Schiller v Sun Rock Bldg. Corp., 260 AD2d 566). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion, as he failed to establish either a reasonable excuse for his default or a meritorious defense. Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover payment on promissory notes, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered December 30, 1999, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of the same court (Gibson, R.), entered May 28, 1999, in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $28,200, upon his default in appearing at trial.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To vacate a judgment entered upon a default, the movant must establish a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action (see, CPLR 5015 [a]; Barbagallo v Nationalise Exterminating & Deodorizing, 260 AD2d 518; Schiller v Sun Rock Bldg. Corp., 260 AD2d 566). The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion, as he failed to establish either a reasonable excuse for his default or a meritorious defense. Mangano, P. J., S. Miller, McGinity, Luciano and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 275, 718 N.Y.S.2d 212, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorrasi-v-vigliotti-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack