Gorodes v. Bruml

86 N.Y.S. 18
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 7, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 18 (Gorodes v. Bruml) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gorodes v. Bruml, 86 N.Y.S. 18 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

FREEDMAN, P. J.

The plaintiff’s assignor, a domestic corporation known as the A. C. Bosselman Company, sold and delivered goods consisting of paper weights to the defendant to the amount of $47.88, for which he gave his promissory note, and also to the amount of $89.26, for which no note was given. Plaintiff proved the sale and delivery of the goods by the corporation to the defendant, the making and delivery of the note by the defendant to the corporation, and the assignment of these claims to plaintiff. The defendant did not successfully dispute any of the foregoing proof, but seemed to rely upon proving a counterclaim set up in his answer, claiming that the corporation had entered into an agreement with him, in which it had contracted not to make any paper weights for any one but the defendant, to be sold at Coney Island, where defendant’s place of business was, for one year, and that the corporation had been guilty of a breach thereof. In this defense he failed. He did prove that he had purchased paper weights made by said corporation at Luna Park, and from dealers upon the island who had them; but where those dealers obtained them was not shown, nor was it shown that the corporation sold them to any person other than the defendant. Defendant also failed to prove any items of damage, and as the proof stood at the close of the case the judgment should have been for the plaintiff, instead of for the defendant.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 N.Y.S. 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorodes-v-bruml-nyappterm-1904.