Gormley v. McNatt

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gormley v. McNatt

188 S.E. 535, 183 Ga. 315, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 225

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 11, 1936

DocketNo. 11521

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 188 S.E. 535 (Gormley v. McNatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gormley v. McNatt, 188 S.E. 535, 183 Ga. 315, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 225 (Ga. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, Justice.

The suit, as amended, is by the superin[316]*316teudent of banks, as statutory receiver of Toombs County Bank, against W. A. McNatt and P. J. McNatt, grantor and grantee respectively in a security deed. The object of the suit is to subject the property conveyed in that deed to the statutory liability of W. A. McNatt as a stockholder of the insolvent Toombs County Bank, and for that purpose the petitioner seeks cancellation of the deed on the ground that it was made to hinder, delay, or defraud the petitioner, a creditor. The court granted a nonsuit on motion of the defendants, and the petitioner excepted. Although the transaction was between near relatives, uncle and nephew, there was no evidence of fraud, circumstantial or otherwise. On the contrary the evidence demanded a finding that consideration, a loan, was actually paid to the grantor by the grantee, and that the deed was properly recorded before the assessment on the stockholders was made known. The admitted fact that the deed was executed on January 1, 1931, but dated January 1, 1930, is not a badge, or slight evidence, of fraud. Since there was no effort to conceal the error in date, it must be viewed as a clerical mistake and without probative value.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, Justice.

The suit, as amended, is by the superin[316]*316teudent of banks, as statutory receiver of Toombs County Bank, against W. A. McNatt and P. J. McNatt, grantor and grantee respectively in a security deed. The object of the suit is to subject the property conveyed in that deed to the statutory liability of W. A. McNatt as a stockholder of the insolvent Toombs County Bank, and for that purpose the petitioner seeks cancellation of the deed on the ground that it was made to hinder, delay, or defraud the petitioner, a creditor. The court granted a nonsuit on motion of the defendants, and the petitioner excepted. Although the transaction was between near relatives, uncle and nephew, there was no evidence of fraud, circumstantial or otherwise. On the contrary the evidence demanded a finding that consideration, a loan, was actually paid to the grantor by the grantee, and that the deed was properly recorded before the assessment on the stockholders was made known. The admitted fact that the deed was executed on January 1, 1931, but dated January 1, 1930, is not a badge, or slight evidence, of fraud. Since there was no effort to conceal the error in date, it must be viewed as a clerical mistake and without probative value.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 S.E. 535, 183 Ga. 315, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gormley-v-mcnatt-ga-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack